geralt "analysis" ca. 2014 via pixabay. Public domain. |
Let's start with good news. The strength (yes only one) of my rough draft is that I had evidence from the text in it.
The bad news is it did nothing else well. The introduction was kind of pretty, like I'd give it a 7 out of 10, if it answered the right prompt. It introduced animal testing instead of rhetoric in my major. The body paragraphs were composed 70% of quotes and evidently 0% effort. I don't know what the other 30% is but we'll just leave it as "it's not good". The conclusion was made of 100% genuine "I'm done with this draft" and it shows.
No comments:
Post a Comment