 |
| godserv "Got Purpose? - Sermon Title" 4/13/10 via Flickr. Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic. |
1. Goal
The goal of my argument is to persuade the reader why alternatives to animal testing currently are or are not plausible replacements using logic.
2. Reactions
It's not possible to persuade hardcore animal lovers that animal testing is necessary. It is possible that the moderate reader on this issue will be swayed and it is possible that those who choose a side based on logic will be swayed.
3. Consequences
I honestly don't anticipate this to produce any sort of consequence. The reader will know more about the issue and maybe tell people about it when it comes up but I don't expect anyone to think this is something that can totally change this controversy.
4. Audience
As stated in the "reactions" section, this will not be effective toward the extreme audience. It could have an effect on the moderate audience and the logical audience.
No comments:
Post a Comment