CloudNinesDesigns "Vector Guitar Outline" 3/26/09 via deviantart.com. Public Domain. |
I. Introduction
1. Hook
2. Introduction approach: frame the consequences
3. Thesis
II. Body Paragraph 1
1. Topic: Proposed alternatives cannot yet determine genetic level causes of disease or determine how a disease becomes resistant to treatments.
2. Evidence 1 and explanation
3. Evidence 2 and explanation
III. Body Paragraph 2
1. Topic: There are no reliable alternatives. Such methods usually compliment, not replace, animal testing.
2. Evidence 1 and explanation
3. Evidence 2 and explanation
IV. Body Paragraph 3
1. Topic: By law, replacements to animal testing must be used whenever possible.
2. Evidence 1 and explanation
3. Evidence 2 and explanation
V. Body Paragraph 4
1. Topic: Legislation around the globe requires pharmaceuticals to be tested in animals for toxic reactions.
2. Evidence 1 and explanation
3. Evidence 2 and explanation
VI. Conclusion
1. Restate thesis
2. Conclusion approach: common ground
I chose "frame the consequences" as my introduction approach because I will frame the consequences of a good alternative to animal testing, which is what my audience would like to see (or possibly believes already exists). This will allow me to relate to my audience immediately and hopefully they give the rest of the essay an opportunity to persuade them. The common ground approach in the conclusion was an obvious choice for me. Both sides of this argument want to see alternatives to animal testing produced.
After reading your outline, I realized that there are some people, like me, who do not like to spend much time on an outline because for me they do not seem to really help out with anything. I think what you did will give you a basic idea of what you are trying to write and it might help you organize your paper better, but for me I think just writing the entire draft might help me more. I hope it works out for you!
ReplyDelete